September 15, 2024
September 10, 2024
amfi-theatros-n-8 amfit- meteoro amfitheatro-rele amfitheatros-g (2001) works audio actions bee news bee park black-aegean box anima box twins II boxes III cave celebrities coins coney island cross cv dialogues diary dig-drawing dig.painting digital memory/κήπος () diktia/net works dismembered documentations drawings droppim coins E e-cvs e-shadows 1998 elements error-e-iroon evros experimental food g avenue g-race-is-t gender race h-space/ x-oroi i-soma-to-typos iconography icons inspiration installations interactive installations internet keimena kermata lighting live lost paintings media forms meteoros metro monos narcissus narrative keyboard negatives networks Notebook notebook erase objects odoiporiko on surveillance/ on-air painting II paintings I panormos people people of st george peru photo orbit Photo-agores photo-air photo-destruction photo-na-ou-s-(i)-as photography photography random time photography-02 public art texts random stories redhook routes ruins a class searching for Dan selfport shadows skylines storytellings subway intervention sunrise t-installation the crazyness- Παραλογισμός THEMES time top-view topia tree trena twins story uncategorized varidia various video installations video stills video twins video works virtual garden virtual portraits void/Κενό w-space/Η πηγή walking web based inst web search well space x-photonudes x-photos xorografies
Contact us
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam non nisl in velit dignissim mollis a rhoncus dolor. Vivamus egestas condimentum erat, in iaculis nulla blandit ut.
:support@superbthemes.com
Phone number
We’re only a call away:
+1 (234) 567-8910
Address
735 Plymouth Street
West Haven, CT 06516
September 8, 2024
The Infinite Canvas: Art has traditionally been seen as a process with a defined beginning, middle, and end. A sculptor finishes chiseling a piece of marble, a painter completes the final stroke, and a filmmaker wraps up with the final cut. Today artists challenge the very notion of “completion” in art: Art is a living, breathing organism in constant flux, never truly reaching a state of finality particularly for artists works primarily in multimedia, where the boundaries between traditional art forms blur, and the opportunity for endless transformation thrives. The creations are never finished; they remain in an eternal state of evolution, shaped and reshaped over time by continuous re-evaluation, elaboration, and transformation.
Art is not a static object, fixed in time once completed. Instead, it is a dynamic process that unfolds over time, constantly absorbing new ideas, experiences, and perspectives. Art created by a combination of video, sound, digital manipulation, and physical elements like objects either ready made. printed or crafted sculpture or painting, defy easy categorisation. This flexibility in medium reflects the fluid approach to creativity, where any piece of art can always be improved, altered, or repurposed. The underlying philosophy here is akin to a Zen-like acceptance of impermanence. Just as a river is never the same from moment to moment, neither is a work of art. What the viewer experiences today might look entirely different tomorrow. What the creator thinks of today might look entirely different tomorrow. This is not just about technical modifications but about the artist’s evolving relationship with the work itself. The act of creation, in his eyes, is an ongoing dialogue between artist and artwork—a relationship that remains open-ended.
A Perfect Fit for Transformation
Multimedia art offers the perfect playground for such an artist, as it inherently resists closure. Unlike painting or sculpture, which traditionally have physical limitations, multimedia allows for layers upon layers of manipulation. A digital video can be edited countless times; a sound installation can grow more complex or minimalistic as new audio tracks are added or substructed. The boundaries of what constitutes the “final” piece are porous, making it possible for the creator to return to and transform his work endlessly.
For example, a digital projection that started as a simple video loop might, over time, accumulate layers of sound, interactivity, and 3D modeling, each transformation prompted by the artist’s new insights or technological advances. A painting could be digitized, animated, and then reintroduced as a part of a virtual reality installation. The potential for reinvention is limitless, giving the artist the freedom to treat each piece as a perpetual work-in-progress.
The Act of Re-Evaluation
Re-evaluation plays a central role in this artist’s process. He is constantly questioning his previous choices, reflecting on how time, external feedback, and internal shifts in understanding could change the work. What was once a finished piece might later seem incomplete or ripe for a new direction. In this sense, re-evaluation is both a creative and critical process. It forces the artist to confront the evolving nature of his artistic voice and question his relationship with each piece.
While traditional artists might experience re-evaluation in the form of retrospectives or critiques, this artist integrates it into the fabric of his work itself. He does not separate past works from his current creative process but sees them as ongoing conversations. This allows for a unique artistic practice where earlier pieces can serve as a foundation for new explorations rather than static artifacts of past ideas.
The Audience’s Role in the Ongoing Process
This approach challenges not only the artist’s relationship with his work but also the audience’s perception of art. Viewers who encounter his multimedia pieces in an exhibition today may return to see something entirely different tomorrow. They become witnesses to the artwork’s ongoing metamorphosis, almost like collaborators in its evolution.
In a world where art is often commodified and valued based on its completion, this artist’s refusal to “finish” his work subverts expectations. His pieces are never quite ready to be put on a pedestal, sold, or archived. Instead, they exist in a state of perpetual becoming, forcing viewers to question their own assumptions about what it means for art to be complete. The audience, therefore, plays an active role, not only in interpreting the piece but in witnessing its continuous transformation, blurring the line between creator, creation, and consumer.
Embracing Impermanence: The Process Over the Product
The beauty of this infinite process is that it elevates the act of creation above the final product. For this artist, art is about the journey rather than the destination. He views each iteration, each transformation, as part of a broader exploration of ideas, emotions, and technical experimentation. His art becomes an expression of time itself—reflecting the fluidity of human thought, the unpredictability of life, and the evolution of technology.
In a way, this artist embodies the idea of art as a form of process philosophy, where change and transformation are the only constants. By never declaring his works finished, he frees himself from the constraints of the art market, gallery deadlines, or critical pressures to produce a “perfect” piece. Instead, he embraces imperfection, flux, and the idea that there is always room for improvement, evolution, and transformation.
Endless recompositions of the past
Conclusion: The Infinite Artist
In a world obsessed with finality and perfection, the artist who sees his work as an ongoing, infinite process stands as a radical figure. His refusal to declare a work complete challenges traditional notions of authorship, audience participation, and the nature of art itself. By working in multimedia, he finds endless avenues for exploration, allowing him to continually reimagine, rework, and renew his creations. In doing so, he not only redefines what it means to be an artist but also offers a profound meditation on the ever-changing nature of creativity, impermanence, and human expression.
In his hands, art is not a product but a process—a living organism that evolves and grows over time, reminding us that in the world of creation, nothing is ever truly finished.
4o
me:write an essay about an artist that thinks that his multimedia works never finish but he can always elaborate improve and transform them into new pieces of art during an infinitive process of re-evaluation and transformation
ai: The Infinite Canvas: The Artist Who Believes His Work Is Never Finished
Art has traditionally been seen as a process with a defined beginning, middle, and end. A sculptor finishes chiseling a piece of marble, a painter completes the final stroke, and a filmmaker wraps up with the final cut. However, there exists a subset of artists who challenge the very notion of “completion” in art. For these creators, art is a living, breathing organism in constant flux, never truly reaching a state of finality. One such artist works primarily in multimedia, where the boundaries between traditional art forms blur, and the opportunity for endless transformation thrives. This artist believes that his creations are never finished; they remain in an eternal state of evolution, shaped and reshaped over time by continuous re-evaluation, elaboration, and transformation.
The Philosophy of Endless Creation
For this artist, art is not a static object, fixed in time once completed. Instead, it is a dynamic process that unfolds over time, constantly absorbing new ideas, experiences, and perspectives. His works, often a combination of video, sound, digital manipulation, and physical elements like sculpture or painting, defy easy categorization. This flexibility in medium reflects his fluid approach to creativity, where any piece of art can always be improved, altered, or repurposed.
The underlying philosophy here is akin to a Zen-like acceptance of impermanence. Just as a river is never the same from moment to moment, neither is a work of art. What the viewer experiences today might look entirely different tomorrow. This is not just about technical modifications but about the artist’s evolving relationship with the work itself. The act of creation, in his eyes, is an ongoing dialogue between artist and artwork—a relationship that remains open-ended.
The Multimedia Medium: A Perfect Fit for Transformation
Multimedia art offers the perfect playground for such an artist, as it inherently resists closure. Unlike painting or sculpture, which traditionally have physical limitations, multimedia allows for layers upon layers of manipulation. A digital video can be edited countless times; a sound installation can grow more complex as new audio tracks are added. The boundaries of what constitutes the “final” piece are porous, making it possible for the artist to return to and transform his work endlessly.
For example, a digital projection that started as a simple video loop might, over time, accumulate layers of sound, interactivity, and 3D modeling, each transformation prompted by the artist’s new insights or technological advances. A painting could be digitized, animated, and then reintroduced as a part of a virtual reality installation. The potential for reinvention is limitless, giving the artist the freedom to treat each piece as a perpetual work-in-progress.
The Act of Re-Evaluation
Re-evaluation plays a central role in this artist’s process. He is constantly questioning his previous choices, reflecting on how time, external feedback, and internal shifts in understanding could change the work. What was once a finished piece might later seem incomplete or ripe for a new direction. In this sense, re-evaluation is both a creative and critical process. It forces the artist to confront the evolving nature of his artistic voice and question his relationship with each piece.
While traditional artists might experience re-evaluation in the form of retrospectives or critiques, this artist integrates it into the fabric of his work itself. He does not separate past works from his current creative process but sees them as ongoing conversations. This allows for a unique artistic practice where earlier pieces can serve as a foundation for new explorations rather than static artifacts of past ideas.
The Audience’s Role in the Ongoing Process
This approach challenges not only the artist’s relationship with his work but also the audience’s perception of art. Viewers who encounter his multimedia pieces in an exhibition today may return to see something entirely different tomorrow. They become witnesses to the artwork’s ongoing metamorphosis, almost like collaborators in its evolution.
In a world where art is often commodified and valued based on its completion, this artist’s refusal to “finish” his work subverts expectations. His pieces are never quite ready to be put on a pedestal, sold, or archived. Instead, they exist in a state of perpetual becoming, forcing viewers to question their own assumptions about what it means for art to be complete. The audience, therefore, plays an active role, not only in interpreting the piece but in witnessing its continuous transformation, blurring the line between creator, creation, and consumer.
Embracing Impermanence: The Process Over the Product
The beauty of this infinite process is that it elevates the act of creation above the final product. For this artist, art is about the journey rather than the destination. He views each iteration, each transformation, as part of a broader exploration of ideas, emotions, and technical experimentation. His art becomes an expression of time itself—reflecting the fluidity of human thought, the unpredictability of life, and the evolution of technology.
In a way, this artist embodies the idea of art as a form of process philosophy, where change and transformation are the only constants. By never declaring his works finished, he frees himself from the constraints of the art market, gallery deadlines, or critical pressures to produce a “perfect” piece. Instead, he embraces imperfection, flux, and the idea that there is always room for improvement, evolution, and transformation.
Conclusion: The Infinite Artist
In a world obsessed with finality and perfection, the artist who sees his work as an ongoing, infinite process stands as a radical figure. His refusal to declare a work complete challenges traditional notions of authorship, audience participation, and the nature of art itself. By working in multimedia, he finds endless avenues for exploration, allowing him to continually reimagine, rework, and renew his creations. In doing so, he not only redefines what it means to be an artist but also offers a profound meditation on the ever-changing nature of creativity, impermanence, and human expression.
In his hands, art is not a product but a process—a living organism that evolves and grows over time, reminding us that in the world of creation, nothing is ever truly finished.
4o
September 6, 2024
In the digital era, memory formation has undergone a profound transformation, shaped by the rapid expansion of technology and our increasing reliance on digital tools. Traditional memory, based on personal experiences and sensory impressions, is now intertwined with the vast digital archives of information, images, and moments stored online. The way we remember, recall, and even forget is influenced by this shift, as technology serves both as an external memory bank and as a mediator of how memories are formed and organized. One of the most significant changes is the outsourcing of memory to digital devices. We no longer rely solely on our minds to store information; instead, we capture moments with cameras, archive thoughts through social media, and store knowledge in cloud systems. This externalization of memory alters the process of recollection. Instead of recalling events through mental imagery, we often retrieve them by revisiting digital records, like photos or videos. The ease with which these moments can be stored and accessed changes the nature of memory, making it less about the act of remembering and more about the ability to retrieve data from a digital source. Furthermore, digital memory is non-linear and fragmented. Online, memories are not bound by time in the way human memory traditionally is. Algorithms and social media often present memories out of sequence—through “memories” features or historical posts—which reshapes how we experience the past. Events once thought to be forgotten can reemerge suddenly, altering our relationship to them. This constant revisiting of the past can blur the lines between lived experience and digital narrative, making the formation of memory more dynamic but also less anchored in a specific context. Additionally, digital memory introduces a collective dimension to personal recollections. Social media platforms, for example, allow individuals to share and reconstruct memories communally. This creates a form of memory that is shaped not only by individual perception but also by collective engagement and commentary. Personal experiences become part of a larger digital network, open to reinterpretation by others, which can enhance or distort the original memory. In the digital era, memory is less about the preservation of pure, unaltered moments and more about the constant curation, reinterpretation, and manipulation of experiences through digital technologies. This shift challenges the way we understand our past and ourselves, as memory becomes a blend of personal recall and external digital archives, reshaping how we engage with our histories.
“The installation is an interactive audiovisual installation that represents an imaginary garden composed by memories, a virtual entity composed of selected audiovisual material. A digitally edited map with position sensors under it, is placed on the floor of the exhibition area. The “map” which constitutes the projection screen of the visual material, defines the place that the user explores both visually and auditory while walking. As a result, based on the viewer’s body position on the map, different narrations and soundscapes are composed depending on the way the parts of the audio-visual archive are being related to each other by the code’s repeating executions. Using an audiovisual archive involving fragmented memories related to a network of different locations and times, the aim is to explore the way digital memory and consequently perception is formed in relation to the viewer’s positions.”
1 INTRODUCTION The interactive installation negotiates concepts such as garden, memory, map, and the relative viewer’s position in space (Fig. 1). Each step of the viewer on a network of sensors, provides a different composition of the audio and visual parts of the archive, a different formation of digital memory (Fig. 2). Audio and visual recordings related to the temporal and spatial identities of various “gardens” Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3483529.3483739
create constant new narrations and interpretations. Different atmospheres that constitute the virtual entity of the garden are revealed and various conflicting elements that make it up are highlighted.
1.1 The garden The definition of the term garden stands is abstract since it is related to different interpretations that have been given by the various cultures, such as the Japanese dry landscapes [1] as well as by various philosophers. We all have a personal idea of what a garden is. A garden might be the imprint of the collaboration of nature with art within the urban space, an area of contemplative pause of urban life where wasted time finds its meaning, an in between space with social, cultural, and psychotherapeutic dimensions to which every historical period and every culture have given their own distinct meanings. In the case of the installation, the transfer of the concept of the garden to the virtual space acquires new meaning related to but also extending those in real space. The virtual version is a space of cultivation, entropy, and conservation of memories in which opposing elements coexist and create elusive atmospheres. By using an archive of audio and video recordings as well as an operational system involving “obsolete” software in the process of its implementation, the installation both as context and as an operational system, concerns a trace of the past in the present.
1.2 Reconstructing Memory
Technical memory in digital culture is an active process which characterized by “its conflation with storage, which produces the odd, almost paradoxical idea of enduring ephemerality”. As Ernst claims it is not so much a place of rest but part of a wider setting of calculation (working memory)”. [3] “But today’s digital fusion of network and archive ushers in a hyperconnectivity, namely ‘a new shaper of patterns of experience both synchronic and diachronic, forging and reforging new assemblages of remembering and forgetting’ (Hoskins and Tulloch 2016,9)”. [3]. The micro archive of the audio-visual material which composes the virtual material of the interactive installation includes various digitally recorded memories. “The digital does reveal alien and unpalatable memories, but it also transcends the time of now and then, reconnecting, reimagining and reconstituting the past as network, as archive, as present”. [2] By the various combinations of the projected shots and consequently the produced different sequences of fragmented memories, memory is separated and released from its spatial and temporal boundaries, is reconstructed, reimagined, and reconstituted.
1.3 The Map
The map positioned on the floor is not a geographical representation but an imprint of the fragmented space that defines the fie
The interactive audiovisual installation is a short of a journey into a mesmerizing, memory-laden wonderland. This project, an “imaginary garden” composed of recollections and fragmented experiences, invites viewers to engage with digital memory in a way that blurs the lines between art, technology, and the human experience. This immersive installation transforms the act of walking into an exploration of memory, sound, and image, where every step takes you deeper into a realm where past and present, real and imagined, coexist in an intricate dance. At the heart of the installation lies a digital map, positioned on the exhibition floor, which becomes both the visual canvas and the foundation for this virtual garden. However, this is no ordinary map; it is a dynamic interface that interacts with the audience in real-time. As visitors walk across the map, their body position triggers sensors beneath, creating a constantly shifting narrative landscape. Each movement leads to a new visual and auditory experience, generated by the intricate relationship between the participant’s steps and the pre-programmed audiovisual archive that defines the space. The installation essentially turns each viewer into a composer, orchestrating their own personal journey through a personal curated collection of memories. The audiovisual material presented isn’t static or predictable. Instead, it is a living, breathing entity—a patchwork of fragmented memories drawn from a variety of locations and times. These snippets of the past weave together in ever-changing combinations as the installation’s underlying code executes repeatedly, ensuring that no two experiences are alike. Bouzas has crafted a delicate interplay between digital memory and human perception, challenging viewers to question how memories are formed, reshaped, and experienced through the lens of technology. The soundscapes that envelop the space are just as vital to the installation as the visuals. As participants explore the virtual map, different sound environments emerge depending on their position. These auditory experiences layer memories with a sense of place, guiding participants into an introspective reflection on how sound and memory are intertwined in shaping our perception of the world. The effect is almost dreamlike: the installation envelops visitors in a cloud of sensory data, composed of echoes from different places and times, as if they are walking through a digital representation of the collective human consciousness. By using fragmented and reassembled audiovisual material, the installation mirrors how our own memories work: they are never whole, but rather collections of moments pieced together to form a narrative. The installation’s map symbolizes the intricate networks of connections between different locations, times, and experiences, representing how our memories are never isolated—they are always part of a larger, interconnected web. As the code continuously reshuffles the visual and auditory material, Bouzas cleverly mimics the process of memory formation and reformation, underscoring the fluidity of perception in a digital world. The installation stands as a poetic exploration of digital memory and human experience, a space where participants are encouraged to lose themselves in the ephemeral, fleeting, and ever-evolving nature of perception. Bouzas has cultivated a truly unique and engaging space—a garden not of flowers, but of memories—where each step leads deeper into a world of introspection and discovery.
September 5, 2024
September 4, 2024
https://www.flickr.com/gp/127933654@N03/JGL739R1LA
https://www.flickr.com/gp/127933654@N03/JGL739R1LA
September 3, 2024
September 1, 2024
2007, DISMEMBERED LANDSCAPES
The proposed project is an audio-video installation concerning the imprint of a discontinuous journey of audio-visual narratives in an invented space. The “dismemberment” arises not only from the architectural structure of the installation that is similar to the known “bar code”, but also from the fragmentation in time and space of the audiovisual material during the process of its synthesis and projection. The installation which is a simulation to a spatial “bar code” refers to the continuous commercialization of nature, acting both as a barrier and as a boundary to a possible dystopia
The imprint of the audiovisual projection on hanged thermal papers creates series of parallel vertical images that resemble a spatial barcode and imply the conversion of the projected landscapes to consumption products. The animated texts, the moving imagery of selected landscapes and the constructed maps are projected on vertical thermal papers which are appropriately arranged within the space and create an impression of transaction products with encoded information. Inside the site and between the vertical parts are created openings that allow the user to navigate between them and explore the spatial status of the installation. The user enters the installation and becomes a part of the bar code.
“The ethics of revolting against a system is a complex and multifaceted issue that depends on various factors, including the nature of the system, the means of revolt, the goals of the revolutionaries, and the potential consequences. Ethical considerations surrounding revolution often involve questions of justice, human rights, and the balance between the need for change and the potential for harm.”
“The means by which a revolution is carried out significantly impact its ethical standing. Nonviolent resistance, as advocated by figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., is often seen as ethically superior because it seeks to achieve change without causing harm. Nonviolent movements aim to appeal to the conscience of the oppressors and the broader public, relying on moral persuasion rather than coercion.”
Cultural communities, defined by shared ethnicity, language, or traditions, have a profound influence on the creation and preservation of art that reflects their unique identity. Art within these communities often serves as a vessel for cultural transmission, passing down stories, values, and aesthetics from one generation to the next. Community networks within these groups help sustain these artistic traditions, ensuring that they remain vibrant and relevant.
Cultural and religious organizations play a crucial role in organizing and sustaining the celebration. These networks are often responsible for planning the various events, such as this one
AMFITHEATROS-8
“Amfitheatros 8” is a powerful commentary on the social and cultural forces that shape our identities. It challenges the notion of fixed identities and highlights the importance of authenticity and self-acceptance. Each performance is a unique exploration of a different facet of identity. The title “Amfitheatros 8” itself is a reflection of the infinite possibilities inherent in identity. The number eight, with its looping, continuous form, symbolizes the endless potential for growth, change, and transformation. “Amfitheatros 8” embodies this sense of limitless possibility, offering a dynamic and evolving exploration of what it means to be human, full of surprises, challenges, and endless possibilities.The performances are dynamic, shifting seamlessly between different styles, tones, and narratives, reflecting the ever-changing nature of who we are. This fluidity mirrors our own experiences, where identity can be a source of empowerment, conflict, and discovery all at once.
Το “Amfitheatros 8” ενθαρρύνει τους θεατές να προβληματιστούν σχετικά με τη δική τους ταυτότητα. Καθώς παρακολουθούν τις παραστάσεις, καλούνται να εξετάσουν τις διαφορετικές πτυχές του εαυτού τους που έρχονται στο προσκήνιο σε διάφορα πλαίσια. Πώς παρουσιάζουμε τους εαυτούς μας σε διαφορετικά περιβάλλοντα; Πώς μεταβάλλονται οι ταυτότητές μας ανάλογα με τις μεταβαλλόμενες συνθήκες; Το “Amfitheatros 8” θέτει αυτά τα ερωτήματα, προωθώντας μια βαθύτερη κατανόηση και εκτίμηση της πολυπλοκότητας της ταυτότητας. Δημιουργεί έναν χώρο όπου οι θεατές μπορούν να εξερευνήσουν τις δικές τους ρευστές ταυτότητες.